This illustration has absolutely nothing to do with tonight's post,
but it is another chance for me to show off my forthcoming mystery.
And who could find a picture of woke?
Pardon my absence from blogging—I’ve
been consumed with proofing, one more time, the manuscript for Irene Deep in
Texas Trouble, before I send it to the formatter. But now that’s off my
desk and sort of off my mind. What’s still on my mind are some current terms
that we hear all the time—terms that are new to our culture in the last few
years.
You may guess that “woke” is
first I’m thinking about. Gov. Ronald DeSantis gave a speech recently in which
he talked about the woke invasion. Everything was in aggressive military terms
which struck me immediately. As he drew a verbal picture of an invading army, I
couldn’t help think how wrong that was—whatever woke is, it is not tangible and
to cast it as an army is ridiculous.
Have you ever noticed that the only people who
talk about woke are right-wing conservatives. If the rest of us use the term,
it is in defense. DeSantis would tell you that it is an acronym that stands for
the Stop the Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees (Stop
WOKE) Act—they really had to stretch to get a title which would make an acronym.
But the real origin is so ironic as to bring forth laughter from progressives—and
no doubt from the Black community. The word came into use among progressive
Black Americans in the nineties—one essay I read refers to it as Black slang. It
meant to be informed, educated, and socially aware, particularly of injustice
and racial inequality. Exactly the opposite of the meaning conservatives have
attached to the word. To them, in their incorrect use, it denotes anything they
don’t approve of, which turns out to be anyone who is not white, straight, male,
and Christian, or any idea that displeases that narrow segment of the
population. It is quite possibly the most ridiculous misappropriation of a word
that I can remember. Yet hundreds of Americans bitterly decry the woke invasion.
Ask them to explain what it means, and nine out of ten are stymied. What a way
to fight a war.
Another term that has been
bothering me is cancel culture, and I’ve only recently gotten a glimmer of what
it means. With current moves to ban classic books like some of Mark Twain or To
Kill a Mockingbird and rewrite such classics as Roald Dahl’s children’s
literature, I always assumed that the phrase meant the right is out to cancel
our historic culture until we end up like an Orwellian society with no past.
Not so! It means we are becoming (or already are) a culture that cancels out
that which doesn’t fit our ideal vision. Wait! What I mean is that Republicans
cancel out (marginalize is a big word these days) whatever doesn’t fit their
ideal of America, from LGBTQ citizens to the history of slavery. Makes you a
bit uncomfortable? We’ll just cancel it, write a law against it, silence those who
disagree with us. The result is we are in danger of raising an entire
generation with no accurate knowledge of history, no understanding of anyone
who differs from them, no grasp of the great literary traditions in world
literature and American literature. Ron DeSantis is not, I suppose, a stupid
man—he has degrees from Yale and Harvard (I used to hear that I relation to the
second Bush and I didn’t buy it then and I don’t buy I now). Yet DeSantis seems
to overlook the maxim that he who doesn’t know history is doomed to repeat its
mistakes.
And therein is a dilemma: is DeSantis
truly ignoring history or is he using that as a political tactic to play to the
amorphous group called “the base” and skyrocket his political aspirations. Does
he really believe what he says or is he simply saying whatever he thinks will
boost him?
These terms, woke and cancel
culture, are matters of language, and it is the uneducated who are easily swayed
by this manipulation of our language. And that is exactly where DeSantis would
have America headed—by taking over public college curricula, banning books,
fining those who speak out, DeSantis is dumbing down if not America yet, at
lest his own corner of the country. And he has ambitions to move beyond that.
It is a frightening prospect, truly frightening.
Please note that if a law being considered
in Florida now passes and if I lived and wrote in Florida, I would probably be
under fire for having blogged about the governor. The only saving grace for me
would be that I am not paid for blogging. IF I were paid, I would be subject to
a $2500 fine. Trust me, few bloggers make that kind of money.
PS Just tonight I read Heather
Cox Richardson’s Letter from an American about President Biden’s significant
visit to the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama on the anniversary of
Bloody Sunday and the voting protest march from Selma to Montgomery. (read it
here: March 5,
2023 (Sunday) - by Heather Cox Richardson (substack.com) This is exactly the kind of history DeSantis and his ilk
would suppress—brutality against people of color. We must not let them succeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment