Despite Larry McMurtry’s complaint that agrarian Texas never produced any great literature, Texas has produced some classics, ranging from John Graves, Goodbye to a River to Dorothy Scarborough’s The Wind. Arguably, the most revered of our books, at least in contemporary times, is McMurtry’s own Lonesome Dove, a saga of western life in which he does everything he says great Texas literature should not do—cattle drives, saloon girls, the Old West come to life.
Now a Texas state legislator,
Republic Jared Patterson of Frisco, wants to ban from school libraries any book
with sexually explicit material. When a fellow legislator challenged him,
Patterson stepped into his own trap. Asked if Lonesome Dove would be
banned, Patterson admitted he’d never read it—one wonders if he and other book
banners read anything—but he went on to say that if it contained sexually
explicit terminology, yes it would be banned. Them’s fightin’ words, pardner!
But to make the whole thing
more hilarious, an ally of Patterson, Christin Bentley, chimed in to say that
she had done a word search of the book—when you can’t read the whole book, do a
word search! Marvelous way to judge literature. She searched for twenty-first-century
sexual terms—the F-bomb, pussy, sex, vagina—and reported that Lonesome Dove passed
her stringent test with flying colors. There is, she concluded, no sexually
explicit material in the book.
That line alone left those of
us who have read the book in tears of hysterical laughter. I remember a
born-again acquaintance of mine complaining way back in the eighties that he thought
his wife was offended when Gus asked Lorena to give him a poke. (Note that the guy
wouldn’t admit offense but laid it off on his wife—always got to protect women
and children). Representatively Bentley, with her earnest good intentions, had
searched for twenty-first century terms in a book set in the 1880s and written
in 1985. The mind boggles.
Apparently Patterson got a lot
of ridicule from both sides of the aisle. Maybe enough to quash his bill.
And it gets worse—we’ve all
heard that a principal in a Florida school that prides itself on a classic
education was fired because she showed a picture of Michaelangelo’s David to
sixth graders. And the inevitable has happened—a couple in Utah is clamoring
for banning the Bible because of all the offensive material in it. And, indeed,
if you are easily offended, you’ll find something to object to in the Bible.
A letter to the editor of the Fort
Worth Star-Telegram pointed out that legislators are busily passing laws to
protect our children from smut, sexually explicit images, trans kids in the
bathroom and the like, while ignoring that most deaths of teens and even younger
children are caused by guns and drugs. When will Texans wake up and stop voting
for people who want to legislate morality but not life-saving measures. Spare
me the Second Amendment arguments or the passing of blame to Mexican cartels
for importing drugs.
Yesterday incensed by Rep.
Patterson’s idiocy, I shared his thoughts on a small, private listserv and was
rewarded by a colleague who pointed out that you can get banned book stickers
on Amazon. I thought it a great idea, approached a neighbor who has a little
free library, but she said she wasn’t interested. She just wants the books to
be fun. That kind of thinking makes me growl. Give us another generation, and
reading will no longer be fun. We will have a generation of students without
world knowledge and with narrow horizons, no opening of the mind. Besides, if
children don’t read about sex, hetero-, homo- and trans-, in books, they will
learn about it on TV and their cell phones. Better they should read literary
treatment of those subjects.
On a different but sad note, I
learned today that I lost a friend of fifty-plus years yesterday. Bill Benge
was a one-of-a-kind good man. He and Sharon had children a little older than
mine fifty years ago when we all lived in the Park Hill neighborhood. We have
remained friends ever since, entertaining each other in our homes, keeping up
with the kids, all the things that friends do. Bill and Sharon were always so
good about including me in events, theater trips, and the like. In recent
years, Bill would call every now and again just to check on how I was doing,
and I returned the favor, though not as often as he would have liked. His
health took a turn for the worse so suddenly that I didn’t have a chance to
tell him how much his friendship and kindness have meant to me over the years.
Now I hope his family realizes that and I send prayers to Sharon, their
children and grandchildren.
My mom was right when, in her
eighties, she said to me the hardest part of growing old was seeing all her
friends die. This has been a heck of a difficult year so far.
6 comments:
Love this, Judy. Thanks for so eloquently pointing out the absurdity of banning books. Lonesome Dove is a favorite of mine.
Len, I'm not sure it's a favorite of mine. I thought it had a soggy middle and we might never get off that darn prairie. But I am beyond indignant at legislators condemning books they have read. Oh, truth is I'm indignant at condemning books at all.
When I was in high school, back in the early '60s, I heard about the book, "Lady Chatterly's Lover", and heard that it was banned in the US.
In early 1972, while in Vietnam, I found that book in paperback lying on a shelf in my unit Dayroom. I carried it off to my "hooch", and read it at night. I was so enthralled with it that I wrapped it in paper, and mailed it home to my wife.
I remember all the fuss about Lady Chatterley's Lover. The book banners today seem not to have discovered it yet.
I think the book ban is ridiculous. Your perspective on the likes of people making these decisions can’t even take the time to read the books.
I am so sorry for your loss. Bill and Sharon were clients of mine years ago. Such wonderful people. He will be missed.
Thanks. Wish I knew who to thank in person.
Post a Comment