This past weekend
a respected figure on the Texas literary scene was accused by a
thirty-something-year-old woman of having harassed her when she was fourteen,
seventeen years ago. This is a man who is noted not only as a writer and poet
but also as an editor and publisher. Over the years he has helped many new and
seasoned writers. (No, I do not know him personally—only by reputation.) He is
a married man with children. Apparently when accused of harassment he wrote a
letter of apology (all before the Me, Too) movement.
All this came out
when the accuser went public recently, causing him to state that his
relationship to her, as a teacher, was strictly platonic. He also resigned from
the state’s most prestigious association of authors to save embarrassment—and I
suppose to save the association from a painful choice. As far as I know, no one
has ever been booted out (yes, I am a member). Since then he has been censured
and punished by other organizations. His once-flourishing career is in shreds.
All this sickened
and saddened me, and led my thoughts to the Me, Too movement again. I am quite
frankly uncertain about it. It’s long past time to out such men as Harvey
Weinstein, Roy Moore, Eric Schneiderman, and others for whom sexually predatory
acts are an ongoing way of life. They are completely selfish, self-centered men
who delight in domination. Probably Bill Cosby fits in that group, though it
saddens me, and maybe our sitting president.
But the lives of a
lot of less well-known men have been destroyed, often based on accusations that
are decades old. And that’s where it gets dicey for me. This woman has been
harboring all her insecurities for seventeen years, insecurities born in a
fourteen-year-old’s mind (if you’ve raised a teen-ager, you’ll understand the
peril there) and no doubt nurtured and encouraged to grow over those years.
What it sounds like to me is that her teacher was fascinated by her and saw talent;
in trying to encourage her he overstepped the bounds not only of the
teacher-student relationship but of general propriety. But I sincerely doubt
his actions were prurient or even lustful. Misguided, yes, by all means.
Someone wrote
yesterday in response to my blog on calling the police. She was read about a
police officer who pulled a gun on a man he thought was stealing Necco wafers
(whatever they are). The writer asked if a bit of candy is worth taking a life
over. My question today is where we draw the line between sexually predatory
behavior and sexual harassment severe enough to ruin a man. When does it become
a crime instead of an annoyance? Many women handle wandering hands and other
annoyances tactfully and quietly, without public attention and, as far as I
know, without great damage to the psyches.
The problem seems
to be one of degree, and we need a definition of sexual harassment, a checklist
if you will. Even with such a list, I am not convinced of the validity of all
these “recovered memories.” Time can distort. And there’s the bandwagon effect—once
a man is accused, other women come out of the woodwork to join in the
accusations.
Maybe I’m an
anomaly. I once described to a younger friend a couple of incidents and
relationships that made me uncomfortable, and she said, “You’ve been harassed,
and you just don’t know it.” Well, okay, if I don’t know it, it didn’t damage
me that much, and I went on with my life without making a mountain out of a
molehill. The classic example to me of women who exaggerated small, meaningless
gestures into a brouhaha were those who were incensed because former President
George H. W. Bush patted them on the behind. I’m quite sure he wasn’t copping a
feel—he thought of it as a friendly, almost affectionate gesture. Yes, it’s a
hangover from an era well put behind us. But for Lord’s sake, he’s an old man
in a wheelchair who has served his country well. Cut him some slack. I am a bit
weary of women on their high horse, though as I try to emphasize I support genuine
victims 150%. Where do we draw the line between abuse and foolishness?
It’s another
conundrum.
2 comments:
We are judging men (in this case) using long ago mores and rules. It is a very dicey conundrum indeed.
Yes, anonymous (oh how I wish you had a name), it troubles me that we are assuming every man is a raging, lustful beast. I've not met many like that but I surely know a lot of good men.
Post a Comment