Last
night was one long dream for me. I was telling myself a novel in three parts—three
parts because twice I got up to use the restroom, not out of necessity, but
because I wanted to leave the world of that dream. But the characters were
persistent and kept returning, although they changed considerably from segment
to segment.
At
first, there were three people, two men and a woman, incarcerated at a prison
in a desert, presumably for nonviolent crimes. They escaped disguised as
employees (more like cleaning people or someone in scrubs than guards) and
spent the night in a nearby empty house. Then they took off in a van.
Sometime
during the night they morphed into three women. Think Thelma and Louise or a
“Golden Girls Take to the Highway” episode. While they were always on the run
and in some perilous circumstances, including snowbound in a cave, they agreed
it was the best time of their lives. (Don’t anyone get Freudian on me!).
Finally, they ended in a twin city area—two small towns. They grocery shopped
in the lesser town figuring they would not know anyone. But they ran into the
husband of one; then another met the love of her life, and the third asked for
a ride to the bus station. I woke up, and my mind finally went back to my WIP.
I know
I’ll never turn the dream into a novel, what with changing characters and a lot
of unexplained things like the snowy cave, but the kernel of a story is there
if I wanted to pursue it. What I found interesting is the process involved, the
way the story flowed in spite of my efforts to stop it. I thought of Elmer
Kelton, the late dean of Texas fiction. He once described writing his
award-winning novel, The Good Old Boys, saying he was sitting at the
bedside of his dying father and listening to stories of the old-time cowboys at
the turn of the twentieth century. Suddenly, he began writing, and the words
wouldn’t stop. Elmer used to say that it was like a horse with the bit in its
teeth, and he was just along for the ride.
Elmer
wrote that way. One of his favorite pieces of advice was, “Listen to your
characters, and they will tell you what’s going to happen.” He did not use
Scrivener or Grammerly, a story bible, or any other devices and aids designed
to help novelists tell a story. He simply told the story. A graduate of the
University of Texas, he was not some unlettered genius but was knowledgeable
about structure and the need for a story arc. He just never let those things
dominate his storytelling.
For
me, the three-part structure of my dream is significant, because I too learned
about structure in school. Not so much the arc within an arc and subplots and
all the intricacies that guide us today, but the basic Shakespearean pattern of
rising action, climax, and denouement. To this day the parts of a novel to me
are the beginning, middle, and end.
To say
that storytelling should be natural is not to jump into the pantser vs.
outliner controversy. I’m a pantser who works best from a page of rough notes.
But I know everyone has to choose the way that works best for them. Perhaps
what I want to suggest about storytelling is that it should be less of a science
and more of an art, more instinctive and organic.
If
you’ve never read Elmer Kelton, you have a treat waiting for you, whether you
think you’re interested in cowboy literature or not. Start with The Good Old
Boys, move on to The Wolf and the Buffalo—Elmer set out to tell the
story of a particular buffalo soldier, but a Commanche chief kept taking over
the story. And then move on to his classic, The Time It Never Rained,
described as one of the twenty or so best novels by an American of the twentieth
century.
Me?
I’m going back to sleep and see what happens next.
No comments:
Post a Comment