I just learned
that my “doctor’s wife” house, the one I lived in for twelve years when my
children were babies, has come on the market—for an exorbitant figuring too
near $2 million for my comfort. I assure you we did not pay much more than 1/8th
that price in 1969 and sold it in 1982 still under ¼ that amount. Times have
changed—and so has the house. It has been remodeled, added on to, redesigned—much
of which hid its good bare bones.
Originally in the
Mediterranean style, it had turned pillars on the front porch, a large terrazzo
entry way which made me immediately fall in love, Mediterranean tiles around
the circular fireplace. Much of that was covered with synthetic substances in a
misguided attempt to upgrade or modernize the house. The second owners after us
asked for pictures because they wanted to restore it to its original state—today
their efforts hardly show, although they are the ones who added a two-story
garage with guest quarters above it, a wonderful addition.
Today the house is
chic and modern and too fussy for me. When we moved in, ugly blue fiberglass
curtains completely hid the lovely curved windows and the house had a general
air of not being loved. We improved what we could on the limited budget of a
new physician, but some of our furniture was old, none of it was expensive. I
would call the house in our day comfortable, a lived-in home. We did add love—it
was a happy house. I can’t say that for it today—but it is fashionable. I don’t
know where I’d kick off my shoes and read a book.
We did gut and
remodel the kitchen, taking out a lot of brickwork. Today the kitchen has been
refigured and remodeled again and a lot of exposed brickwork added. What goes
round, comes round.
My kids have been
spare in their comments except to say they don’t recognize many parts of it.
One son loves the new patio, as do I, but I sure wouldn’t have put a pool in
that yard. It’s where my ex grew twenty tons of green beans—too bad he’s no
longer alive to appreciate the irony.
The whole transformation—and
the price—reminded me of my childhood home. We saw it on our September visit to
Chicago. The kids were astounded when I said to stop, that was the house. I had
talked about a changing neighborhood, and I guess that didn’t compute for them.
They thought poor.
The house today,
we guess, is worth one million. Built in 1893, it’s fashioned like a brownstone
but made of red brick with elaborate stone work with a typical bay window. I
think my dad bought it in the 1930s for under $10,000. It’s tall and skinny,
with a half third floor. Whereas in my day the houses all had wooden front
porches—we screened ours in summers and lived there, today the porches are all
gone and the tiny front yards, once just a patch of grass, are now landscaped
with Japanese maple and other exotic plants.
I visited the
other day with the girl who grew up next door—then, my dad’s garden, an extra
lot, was between our houses. Today, there’s a house there that the owner told
us was designed to fit in with my home. But Judy (her name too) told me she
always thought of ours as an upper middle class neighborhood. That’s even
stretching a point to me but it was nothing like it is today.
Do you think my
living in these houses has influenced the price? Can we advertise “Judy Alter
slept here” as in the old saw about George Washington? I doubt that would have
an effect. And somewhere along the way, maybe when I had an empty nest, I got
over the craving for a bigger and better house. Today, I live in 600 square
feet and couldn’t be happier. There’s a moral there somewhere but I’m not going
to figure it out.
No comments:
Post a Comment