Warning: a political blog coming. Stop
now if you don’t want to hear about my puzzlement. As most of my readers know,
I write as a liberal—my sons-in-law would probably tell you from the far far
left.
I’m not sure how I feel about Hillary
Clinton. I think she smart, intelligent, well versed in political doings and
protocol; and I think she would do an efficient, capable job as president. But
a little something holds me back—perhaps it’s my enthusiasm about the ideas of
Bernie Sanders, though I harbor a lingering doubt that he could effectively put
them into practice as president and he might be over his head internationally.
Let’s say I like Bernie’s philosophy better but I have more faith in Hillary—wow!
Just now worked that out in my mind.
But I think Hillary is getting a
really raw deal from the Republicans. Now that Kevin McCarthy has openly
blurted that the Benghazi investigations are nothing more than an attempt to
stop Hillary’s campaign momentum, what more do people need to know? How many
Benghazi committee investigations have there been (I’ve lost count—but I know
they all came up empty and at great cost to that budget Republicans keep
worrying about when convenient). There were more embassy attacks and more
Americans killed on George W. Bush’s watch than Obama’s, but no one raised an
eyebrow. With McCarthy’s verbal blunder, I hope we can put Benghazi to rest—as someone
said, the ongoing fruitless investigations are an insult to the memory of four
courageous Americans killed there.
And, oh yes, those emails. I’m not as
clear on what’s involved, but I have read, repeatedly, that Bush and Cheney
deleted thousands of emails that they had sent and exchanged on the server of
the Republican National Committee. Since I am among those who think those two
men did irreparable harm to this country, harm that may not be undone for
generations, I am at a loss as to why that record is not being investigated.
Instead we are bombarded almost daily with headlines blaring that more emails
have been discovered, etc., in spite of the fact that to date investigation
reveals that while using a private server may have been an act of poor
judgment, it was not at the time against the law. I blame the media in part for
continuing to stir the pot.
It seems clear to me that Republicans
are out to scuttle Hillary’s campaign any way they can, morality, ethics, even
legality be damned. I realize that politics is, unfortunately, a dirty business
and probably nobody’s hands are lily white, but I think the conservatives are
sinking lower than I thought possible. That’s not the kind of country I thought
I lived in nor is it the kind I want to live in.
This might be my personal endorsement
of Hillary Clinton for president in 2016.
2 comments:
Short and succinct - nicely stated. I, too, find the furor over something so many others did with no questions raised, until it was convenient as a tool to cause political embarrassment, to be equally opportunistic. Then again, the detractors have so little to work with. So they look under rocks to find something, anything, they can hang their hats on and twirl them around so no one is watching where their hands go.
OK, enough of metaphors and ranting. Just really liked your post.
I think you said it all especially with respect to the double standard used to view Hilary's emails and those of the Republican "guys".
Post a Comment