People talk about the world of books, but I’d like to
suggest there are a whole lot of separate worlds within that generalization. For
you mystery addicts, there are several kinds of mysteries—traditional (traces
back to Agatha Christie and beyond), cozies (are they a subset of traditional
or are they becoming their own thing?), suspense and thriller (where is the
line between those two?), vampire, paranormal and probably ten others I haven’t
mentioned. Neither readers nor authors can satisfactorily define any of these,
and it’s up to readers to find books they like and authors to write what their
instincts—or their heart—tell them. As they say, you can’t tell a book by the
cover.
But there’s another division within the world of mystery
that puzzles me. I belong to Sisters in Crime, an organization founded way back
in the ‘80s to protest the treatment of women authors of mystery fiction. We’ve
come a long way, baby, but the group is vital and draws attention to the superb
writing of many women, including founding mother Sara Paretsky. Because I
monitor for SinC once a week, I’m familiar with many of the names. I also
belong to Guppies, a subgroup whose name stands either for Going to be
Published or The Great Unpublished. Membership in SinC is required to belong to
Guppies, which is a warm, supportive, and informative group, much less
structured than SinC. Many of us who are published hang around because of the
friendship and congratulations and, sometimes, sheer silliness. Since I’m on
the steering committee, I know many of the names of this 500+ member group too.
And, wonder of wonders, there are women mystery writers who belong to neither
group.
There’s the Dorothy L listserv, named after Dorothy L.
Sayers and run out of Kent State University, which has an active popular
culture program. It’s sort of an elite list, where friends bond, titles are
reviewed, recommended, news shared—usually professional but sometimes private.
I consider myself a fringe member—I have timidly contributed a few times but
have not really become friends with any of the regulars and never seen a
mention of my work. Still, I read it to be informed. Dorothy L. comes out twice
a day.
I also subscribe to an online daily newsletter, “Shelf
Awareness.” They do a version for booksellers and three times a week a version
for readers. I skim both, paying particular mention to the mystery/suspense
titles mentioned with brief reviews. It’s rare that I see an author’s name that
I recognize from all my other affiliations.
All this means I receive about 300 emails a day. And you
wonder that I don’t write the great American novel? But what puzzles me is the
lack of overlap in these various lists. I sometimes wonder if there’s a caste
system, where Shelf Awareness speaks only to Dorothy L (or the New York Times
Book Review) and so on down the line. It’s a mystery to me.
2 comments:
Interesting. I'm a Guppy so I see a lot of the same names as you do, but you're right - there seem to be a lot of circles that do not overlap. That's a shame.
Agreed, LD. I'd like to see more overlap in both directions. I really admire the published Guppies who hang around to help newbies. And I suspect some big names started in Sisters in Crime and now think they've moved on--when we'd welcome their advice and experience.
Post a Comment